Questions to ask people for Vox-pops
1. What is your opinion of teenagers?
2. Do you get intimidated by teenagers?
3. Do you think teenagers are more violent now than they were in the past?
4. How do you think teenagers could get a better image?
5. Do you think teenagers are stereotyped too much?
6. What stereotype were/are you as a teenager?
7. Do you think teenagers are going to get worse in the future?
8. Do you think there are more gangs now than there were in the past?
9. What did/do you do at weekends as a teenager?
10. Do you think something should be done to get teenagers off the streets?
11. What type of teenager were you?
Thursday 14 October 2010
Codes and Conventions of Documentaries
Interviews
• Facts and figures
• Always have a problem in the middle of the narrative structure
• Voice over’s
• Cut away shots
• Natural shots
• Sometimes reconstructions
• Evidence
• Eye line needs to be a third down
• Relevant mise-en-scene
• Music bed
• Sound effects are often added for dramatisation
• Opening titles
• Simple and sometimes formal graphics
• Experts are named
• No opposing questions
• Vox pops
• Archive footage
• Variety of different camera angles
• Exposition is made clear either at the start or throughout
• Facts and figures
• Always have a problem in the middle of the narrative structure
• Voice over’s
• Cut away shots
• Natural shots
• Sometimes reconstructions
• Evidence
• Eye line needs to be a third down
• Relevant mise-en-scene
• Music bed
• Sound effects are often added for dramatisation
• Opening titles
• Simple and sometimes formal graphics
• Experts are named
• No opposing questions
• Vox pops
• Archive footage
• Variety of different camera angles
• Exposition is made clear either at the start or throughout
Research Record
We are using shots of the video that is on the website, using the statistics and some of the vox pops.
We selected information because it has accurate statistics and quotes from people affected by antisocial behaviour.
We are using video and editing parts from the clip and putting it into our documentary.
We wanted to show parts of this video because it is an example of how people can be influenced and how opinions of a certain stereotype can be made. This can be useful to our documentary.
We selected parts of this article but are not using it in the documentary.
We selected this information to help us with our documentary and script writing so we could make full use of the voice over.
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/crimejusticeandthelaw/crimeprevention/dg_4001652
We selected the list on what is classed as antisocial behaviour.
We wanted to use this information because many people don't understand what classes as antisocial behaviour.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100413151441/crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/asbos/asbos2.htm
We wanted to use some of the statistics from the table in our documentary as evidence.
We chose to use this table because it is accurate accounts of how many ASBO's were given out between 1999 and 2007.
Interview Questions
Questions for Teachers
Interviewees: Teachers, Parents, Youth Workers and Teenagers
1.) During your time as a teacher, have you noticed at what point the children change in their personality and behavior and possibly what caused this change?
2.) What does your son/daughter do for their hobbies, and where they similar to yours as a teen?
3.) What seems to be the most common recurring issue when dealing with teenagers?
4.) Who is the most influential person who influences you?
5.) During break/lunch/after school times, have you noticed their being much more violence between the teens?
6.) Do you think that no matter what your parenting technique, teenagers will do whatever they want whenever they want?
7.) Do you think youth clubs help to prevent teens from hanging around the streets and causing trouble?
8.) Has the rise in cheap alcohol and more lenient shop owners helped to increase the number of antisocial behavior cases in teens?
9.) What do you think should be done to improve the current situation? i.e. bringing back national service.
10.) Are you intimidated by the youth of today, and if so what stereotype would you consider them to be?
11.) In your opinion, would you consider yourself to be the ideal role model for your child?
12.) What are the differences key between todays youth and the youth of your generation?
13.) Are you fearful that your children may turn out to be like the youth of today through no fault of your own?
Interviewees: Teachers, Parents, Youth Workers and Teenagers
1.) During your time as a teacher, have you noticed at what point the children change in their personality and behavior and possibly what caused this change?
2.) What does your son/daughter do for their hobbies, and where they similar to yours as a teen?
3.) What seems to be the most common recurring issue when dealing with teenagers?
4.) Who is the most influential person who influences you?
5.) During break/lunch/after school times, have you noticed their being much more violence between the teens?
6.) Do you think that no matter what your parenting technique, teenagers will do whatever they want whenever they want?
7.) Do you think youth clubs help to prevent teens from hanging around the streets and causing trouble?
8.) Has the rise in cheap alcohol and more lenient shop owners helped to increase the number of antisocial behavior cases in teens?
9.) What do you think should be done to improve the current situation? i.e. bringing back national service.
10.) Are you intimidated by the youth of today, and if so what stereotype would you consider them to be?
11.) In your opinion, would you consider yourself to be the ideal role model for your child?
12.) What are the differences key between todays youth and the youth of your generation?
13.) Are you fearful that your children may turn out to be like the youth of today through no fault of your own?
Running Order
Documentary: Teenage Evolution
Channel: Channel 4
Scheduling: November 10th 8:00pm till 8:30pm
Duration: 27 minutes (including advert break)
1.) CCTV Footage and news report articles of antisocial behavior by teenagers cut together slow at first but gradually getting quicker and quicker to emphasise the large number of cases. - 10 seconds
2.) Opening credits and titles of teenagers and their change in appearance i.e. stereotype, age group etc. - 5 seconds
3.) First shot panning in close up of teenagers, their parents and their grandparents with a voice over giving facts and figures about antisocial behavior through the generations and how it differs. - 15 seconds
4.) Voice over introduces the topic and introduces a case study of whether the youth of today are more violent and the main differences between todays current youth and the youth of other generations. - 15 seconds
5.) An expert on the topic gives information on what causes this behavior. -40 seconds
6.) Cut away shot to the case study a troubled teenager who ives an interview on what got he/she where they are today and what should be changed etc. - 40 seconds
7.) Interview with parents of the teen and information on what things were like when they were teenagers. - 1 minute
8.) Voice over talks about aspects of why teenagers behave this way, shots used of archive footage and the way teenagers are presented in the press. news reports and headlines from newspapers. -1 minute 15 seconds
9.) Next the camera moves to the side of teenagers that the media don't show, the good side from working to help the elderly to youth centres that have been set p to help struggling youths. - 45 seconds
10.) Street team go out and ask members of the public to share their thoughts and opinions. - 2 minutes
11.) Reconstruction of one persons account of antisocial behavior voiced over by themselves. - 1 minute 30 seconds
12.) Moving back to the expert to diagnose the problems and why this happened. - 1 minute
13.) Cut away shots of blanked out teenagers hanging around street corners drinking taking drugs, then merging them into the credits before going to an advert break. - 30 seconds
14.) Opening credits and titles set against news headlines- 5 seconds
15.) ADVERT BREAK - 3 minutes
16.) Opening credits and titles - 5 seconds
17.) Voice over introduces some statistics with a montage of website clipings, news headlines and reports with interviews from people who created the surveys and stats. - 1 minute
18.) Case is brought up by the voice over on a police matter involving a teenagers death, then information is introduced that will link in with the next shot. - 1 mintue
19.) Police views on the matter and members of the police sharing their accounts of their run ins with the youth of today, using archive footage, teenagers in cells etc - 2 mins
20.) A look back through the years on ways of which the authorities dealth with teenagers causuing trouble on the streets and whether or not they worked and had an impact on their behavior. - 1 minute
21.) Camera moves back to the case study and applies some of the techniques that were used back in the olden days to the youth of today to see if they will work like they did back then. - 40 seconds
22.) Footage of a week with the case study and how they got on during the week having implamented some of the rules. - 2 minutes
23.) Interviews with the parents of the teenagers to see if they noticed any changes in behavior or their attitudes during the past week. - 30 seconds
24.) The teenagers themselves are interviewed about their experiences and are asked whether or not they thought some of the things that were tried would work if roled out nationaly. - 45 seconds
25.) Static camera of all teenagers walking together with all different sterotypes towards the camera then breaking up and going off in different directions. - 30 seconds
26.) Experts, teenagers, parents and grand parents are all brought together to discuss what they have done and seen whilst making the documentary. - 1 minute
27.) Voice over summarises what has been seen throughout the documentary, with cut aways of footage already seen linked together linking to what is being said by the narrator. - 45 seconds
28.) End credits in the same style as the opening titles, using different colours brighter - 30 seconds
Channel: Channel 4
Scheduling: November 10th 8:00pm till 8:30pm
Duration: 27 minutes (including advert break)
1.) CCTV Footage and news report articles of antisocial behavior by teenagers cut together slow at first but gradually getting quicker and quicker to emphasise the large number of cases. - 10 seconds
2.) Opening credits and titles of teenagers and their change in appearance i.e. stereotype, age group etc. - 5 seconds
3.) First shot panning in close up of teenagers, their parents and their grandparents with a voice over giving facts and figures about antisocial behavior through the generations and how it differs. - 15 seconds
4.) Voice over introduces the topic and introduces a case study of whether the youth of today are more violent and the main differences between todays current youth and the youth of other generations. - 15 seconds
5.) An expert on the topic gives information on what causes this behavior. -40 seconds
6.) Cut away shot to the case study a troubled teenager who ives an interview on what got he/she where they are today and what should be changed etc. - 40 seconds
7.) Interview with parents of the teen and information on what things were like when they were teenagers. - 1 minute
8.) Voice over talks about aspects of why teenagers behave this way, shots used of archive footage and the way teenagers are presented in the press. news reports and headlines from newspapers. -1 minute 15 seconds
9.) Next the camera moves to the side of teenagers that the media don't show, the good side from working to help the elderly to youth centres that have been set p to help struggling youths. - 45 seconds
10.) Street team go out and ask members of the public to share their thoughts and opinions. - 2 minutes
11.) Reconstruction of one persons account of antisocial behavior voiced over by themselves. - 1 minute 30 seconds
12.) Moving back to the expert to diagnose the problems and why this happened. - 1 minute
13.) Cut away shots of blanked out teenagers hanging around street corners drinking taking drugs, then merging them into the credits before going to an advert break. - 30 seconds
14.) Opening credits and titles set against news headlines- 5 seconds
15.) ADVERT BREAK - 3 minutes
16.) Opening credits and titles - 5 seconds
17.) Voice over introduces some statistics with a montage of website clipings, news headlines and reports with interviews from people who created the surveys and stats. - 1 minute
18.) Case is brought up by the voice over on a police matter involving a teenagers death, then information is introduced that will link in with the next shot. - 1 mintue
19.) Police views on the matter and members of the police sharing their accounts of their run ins with the youth of today, using archive footage, teenagers in cells etc - 2 mins
20.) A look back through the years on ways of which the authorities dealth with teenagers causuing trouble on the streets and whether or not they worked and had an impact on their behavior. - 1 minute
21.) Camera moves back to the case study and applies some of the techniques that were used back in the olden days to the youth of today to see if they will work like they did back then. - 40 seconds
22.) Footage of a week with the case study and how they got on during the week having implamented some of the rules. - 2 minutes
23.) Interviews with the parents of the teenagers to see if they noticed any changes in behavior or their attitudes during the past week. - 30 seconds
24.) The teenagers themselves are interviewed about their experiences and are asked whether or not they thought some of the things that were tried would work if roled out nationaly. - 45 seconds
25.) Static camera of all teenagers walking together with all different sterotypes towards the camera then breaking up and going off in different directions. - 30 seconds
26.) Experts, teenagers, parents and grand parents are all brought together to discuss what they have done and seen whilst making the documentary. - 1 minute
27.) Voice over summarises what has been seen throughout the documentary, with cut aways of footage already seen linked together linking to what is being said by the narrator. - 45 seconds
28.) End credits in the same style as the opening titles, using different colours brighter - 30 seconds
Formal Proposal
Formal Proposal
The main topic of our documentary is teenage subcultures and how teenagers have changed over time from the mods and rockers of the sixties to the chavs and moshers of today. Everyone will have an opinion on this subject as everyone was a teenager at some point in their life and many people were part of the subcultures at this time. Another topic in our documentary is how the public feel about teenagers today and their opinions on certain issues such as stereotyping of teenagers and how teenagers behave in today’s society.
Our documentary will be mixed as it will be combining a voiceover with interviews, vox pops and both archive and new footage. This will be good as it will show the audience how they were teenagers as many people tend to forget what they were like as teenagers and how they were treated by people at this time.
We intend to show our documentary on Channel 4 as it is renowned for its selection of documentaries and how they target certain issues of society and a majority of its documentaries are mixed, we also intend to show our documentary at 8:00pm as it is late enough for children to be in bed and their parents to have finished any jobs they may have but still early enough that teenagers will still be downstairs with their parents.
The main target audience of our documentary is 15-50 as most people at this age will have children/teenagers of their own or will still be teenagers or young adults. This would be beneficial as many people in this target audience will understand better the conflicts of social prejudice towards teenagers and the stereotyping of them by the media better than a slightly older audience that may have older children.
The primary research we will do will include finding out about teenage subcultures throughout time, this will be done by visiting exhibitions about mods and rockers in the 1960’s and by interviewing people about their memories of being a teenager and what they think of teenagers in today’s society. Our interview locations will be relative to the subject of teenagers as we intend to film in a youth centre, this is so we can speak to both teenagers and the volunteers that work with them.
Our secondary research will consist of archive footage and pictures of Woodstock in 1969, Mods and Rockers fighting in the 60’s, footage of Skinheads causing trouble in the 70’s, Punks, Deathrockers and Goths of the 80’s and the 90’s grunge movement and how that affected the teenage audience and also some footage from now as to how teenagers are behaving in today’s society, we also intend to use various clips from music videos and sound clips from different music eras such as Elvis to show the music Rockers listen to and Nirvana to show the grunge movement.
Our narrative is basically going to show the audience how teenagers have changed through time and how there are still some similarities between the teenagers of the past and now such as many hippies in the 1960’s were taking drugs and living promiscuously, much like many teenagers today taking drugs and living promiscuously. We will look at footage of different subcultures and determine where different modern subcultures have evolved from.
Outline of content
Intro section, 5-10 minutes:
Opening credits will be set against a black background, with the title contrasting in white in a very standardised font. By doing this it won’t detract from everything else that is going on in the shot, for example we hope to be able to fade the black background into close ups of teenagers faces starting with the current youth and changing them through to their parents faces and then their grandparents faces. Over this we will put a music bed that relates to the topic in question so either a currently popular music track, or one that suits the documentary best. The first shot would contain photo clippings, news reports and archive footage of teenagers causing antisocial behaviour with a voice over giving facts and figures out about antisocial behaviour, crime rates and the links between that causes this behaviour in teenagers.
Each subject that would be brought up an expert would be introduced to give his views and opinions then cut away shot would be used to go to items that he says that relate. Street team would go out and ask members of the public from varying generations a few questions on the topic and if any had a bad experience with teenagers and we expect this to be the elderly we will conduct a dramatic reconstruction to make the audience feel how they felt so a few camera techniques and angles will be used for that. During the reconstruction the music used would mirror the action that was going on, dark, dramatic tones possibly even operatic with perhaps sound FX of things that were there at the time for example breaking of glass and the sound of someone being hit. Cut aways would be used again of police reports of incidences of underage drinking, binge drinking and drug taking all with a voice over explaining the relation between this and behaviour.
Middle section, 10-15 minutes:
Interviews would be conducted with parents and their parents to see what differs from the youth of today and the youth from their generations. No music beds during any of the interviews just the natural ambiance of them. The expert would be brought back in again to help piece together the views of the parents etc and would move us to the next shot which would see a case study of teenagers and their families from a poorer social background, a middle class background and an upper-class background and how each one differs from one another. The way they behave in school/college, what they do at the weekends, hanging out with their friends, everything along those lines.
What will also be looked into would be where the younger generation get their influences from, be it their friends, the music they listen to, or even their parents. Interviews of their influences from the music industry and from this we would get their views and opinions and also why they think that their music and themselves are such big influences on younger people. Next the narrator will pose a question which will be answered nearer to the end of the film allowing time for all information about the question to be presented, allowing the audience to decide an answer for themselves before the answer is revealed.
End section, 5-10 minutes:
Towards the ending of our documentary, the question that was posed in the middle section will be answered by all parties involved, giving a variation on the end result which hopefully will mimic the viewer’s ideas and feelings. The same graphics that were seen at the beginning of our piece will be used for the end credits as well although there will be a colour change depending on the outcome, bad - font colour will change from white to a gradual red but if it’s good then we will keep the font the same colour as before. The voice over summarises everything that has been said and presented to the viewers in a small period of time, giving a brief overview and then steering the audience to the answers for the questions arose in the film. Music bed would return for the outro and would stay the same
Resource Requirements
Camera
Tripod
Microphone
Headphones
The main topic of our documentary is teenage subcultures and how teenagers have changed over time from the mods and rockers of the sixties to the chavs and moshers of today. Everyone will have an opinion on this subject as everyone was a teenager at some point in their life and many people were part of the subcultures at this time. Another topic in our documentary is how the public feel about teenagers today and their opinions on certain issues such as stereotyping of teenagers and how teenagers behave in today’s society.
Our documentary will be mixed as it will be combining a voiceover with interviews, vox pops and both archive and new footage. This will be good as it will show the audience how they were teenagers as many people tend to forget what they were like as teenagers and how they were treated by people at this time.
We intend to show our documentary on Channel 4 as it is renowned for its selection of documentaries and how they target certain issues of society and a majority of its documentaries are mixed, we also intend to show our documentary at 8:00pm as it is late enough for children to be in bed and their parents to have finished any jobs they may have but still early enough that teenagers will still be downstairs with their parents.
The main target audience of our documentary is 15-50 as most people at this age will have children/teenagers of their own or will still be teenagers or young adults. This would be beneficial as many people in this target audience will understand better the conflicts of social prejudice towards teenagers and the stereotyping of them by the media better than a slightly older audience that may have older children.
The primary research we will do will include finding out about teenage subcultures throughout time, this will be done by visiting exhibitions about mods and rockers in the 1960’s and by interviewing people about their memories of being a teenager and what they think of teenagers in today’s society. Our interview locations will be relative to the subject of teenagers as we intend to film in a youth centre, this is so we can speak to both teenagers and the volunteers that work with them.
Our secondary research will consist of archive footage and pictures of Woodstock in 1969, Mods and Rockers fighting in the 60’s, footage of Skinheads causing trouble in the 70’s, Punks, Deathrockers and Goths of the 80’s and the 90’s grunge movement and how that affected the teenage audience and also some footage from now as to how teenagers are behaving in today’s society, we also intend to use various clips from music videos and sound clips from different music eras such as Elvis to show the music Rockers listen to and Nirvana to show the grunge movement.
Our narrative is basically going to show the audience how teenagers have changed through time and how there are still some similarities between the teenagers of the past and now such as many hippies in the 1960’s were taking drugs and living promiscuously, much like many teenagers today taking drugs and living promiscuously. We will look at footage of different subcultures and determine where different modern subcultures have evolved from.
Outline of content
Intro section, 5-10 minutes:
Opening credits will be set against a black background, with the title contrasting in white in a very standardised font. By doing this it won’t detract from everything else that is going on in the shot, for example we hope to be able to fade the black background into close ups of teenagers faces starting with the current youth and changing them through to their parents faces and then their grandparents faces. Over this we will put a music bed that relates to the topic in question so either a currently popular music track, or one that suits the documentary best. The first shot would contain photo clippings, news reports and archive footage of teenagers causing antisocial behaviour with a voice over giving facts and figures out about antisocial behaviour, crime rates and the links between that causes this behaviour in teenagers.
Each subject that would be brought up an expert would be introduced to give his views and opinions then cut away shot would be used to go to items that he says that relate. Street team would go out and ask members of the public from varying generations a few questions on the topic and if any had a bad experience with teenagers and we expect this to be the elderly we will conduct a dramatic reconstruction to make the audience feel how they felt so a few camera techniques and angles will be used for that. During the reconstruction the music used would mirror the action that was going on, dark, dramatic tones possibly even operatic with perhaps sound FX of things that were there at the time for example breaking of glass and the sound of someone being hit. Cut aways would be used again of police reports of incidences of underage drinking, binge drinking and drug taking all with a voice over explaining the relation between this and behaviour.
Middle section, 10-15 minutes:
Interviews would be conducted with parents and their parents to see what differs from the youth of today and the youth from their generations. No music beds during any of the interviews just the natural ambiance of them. The expert would be brought back in again to help piece together the views of the parents etc and would move us to the next shot which would see a case study of teenagers and their families from a poorer social background, a middle class background and an upper-class background and how each one differs from one another. The way they behave in school/college, what they do at the weekends, hanging out with their friends, everything along those lines.
What will also be looked into would be where the younger generation get their influences from, be it their friends, the music they listen to, or even their parents. Interviews of their influences from the music industry and from this we would get their views and opinions and also why they think that their music and themselves are such big influences on younger people. Next the narrator will pose a question which will be answered nearer to the end of the film allowing time for all information about the question to be presented, allowing the audience to decide an answer for themselves before the answer is revealed.
End section, 5-10 minutes:
Towards the ending of our documentary, the question that was posed in the middle section will be answered by all parties involved, giving a variation on the end result which hopefully will mimic the viewer’s ideas and feelings. The same graphics that were seen at the beginning of our piece will be used for the end credits as well although there will be a colour change depending on the outcome, bad - font colour will change from white to a gradual red but if it’s good then we will keep the font the same colour as before. The voice over summarises everything that has been said and presented to the viewers in a small period of time, giving a brief overview and then steering the audience to the answers for the questions arose in the film. Music bed would return for the outro and would stay the same
Resource Requirements
Camera
Tripod
Microphone
Headphones
Brainstorm Of Documentary Content
Possible ideas to be included in our documentary:
During the intro we would use music that relates to the subject directly.
With it being teenagers we expect to use either rap, rock or pop and by using this we will draw in the younger crowd to watching our documentary.
Music would be different during reconstructions, dark and dramatic.
May or may not decide to use a music bed throughout the documentary.
Simple graphics when introducing someone so it doesn't distract from the rest of the shot, most likely white standardised font.
Eye catching opening credits and end credits.
Interviews with members of the public with varying generations, todays youth, their parents and Grandparents.
Questions on antisocial behavior,
Experts brought in to share views and their opinions on the topic.
Voice over with a steady pace, presented in a news reporter style.
Male or Female well spoken.
Archive footage of items relating to the topic, CCTV and news reports.
Cut away shots to segments that the voice over talks about.
Background information and stories on the youth of today.
Dramatic reconstructions including those that would be brought up my members of the public who had been asked prior.
Eye witness accounts
Production Schedule
Name of Programme: Teenage Evolution
Directors: Rebecca Marshall, Lucy Patterson and Jack McLoughlin
Producers: Rebecca Marshall, Lucy Patterson and Jack McLoughlin
Client: OCR
Date production started: 27th September 2010
Formal Proposal started: 6th October 2010
Formal Proposal Completed:8th October 2010
Storyboard started: 8th October 2010
Storyboard Completed: 12th October 2010
Shooting started: 4th October
Date Completed:
Post production started: 1st November
Date Completed : 15th November
Rough cut submitted: 15th November 2010
Final show tape completed: 22nd December 2010
Sent to Client: 17th December 2010
Directors: Rebecca Marshall, Lucy Patterson and Jack McLoughlin
Producers: Rebecca Marshall, Lucy Patterson and Jack McLoughlin
Client: OCR
Date production started: 27th September 2010
Formal Proposal started: 6th October 2010
Formal Proposal Completed:8th October 2010
Storyboard started: 8th October 2010
Storyboard Completed: 12th October 2010
Shooting started: 4th October
Date Completed:
Post production started: 1st November
Date Completed : 15th November
Rough cut submitted: 15th November 2010
Final show tape completed: 22nd December 2010
Sent to Client: 17th December 2010
Sunday 10 October 2010
Escape From Auschwitz
Type Of Documentary- This is a mixed documentary as it combines a powerfully worded informative voice over with authentic footage of the concentration camp itself and interviews with experts on this subject.
Themes- The main themes of this documentary are the deaths and treatment of the Jews whilst at the camp and the war seemingly forgetting them, the issue of guns is also raised, the documentary is set in a very dark way as it shows the authentic footage with a sinister edge to everything. The authentic footage also gives the audience a feeling like they can see what the Second World War was really like and they can empathise with the soldiers and the Jews.
Narrative Structure- The documentary poses many questions from the beginning such as Did anyone escape from Auschwitz? Who escaped? What happened to them? This is what the audience would be thinking at this time during the documentary. The middle begins to answer these questions as it explains to the audience that 400 people managed to escape from Auschwitz but asks the question Will people ever become free of Auschwitz? This question is answered in the ending of the documentary as it informs the audience that on the 27th January 1945 Auschwitz was liberated and all the Jews freed, this gives the audience a sense of closure but also saddens them as so many people have died.
Camerawork-There was a lot of tracking and panning evolved in this documentary as part of it was following interviewees around the camp. The interviews used a static camera to ensure a good head and shoulder shot of the interviewees, this enabled the audience to see the emotion on their faces and the tears in their eyes. Long shots were also used to show the audience the extent of the conditions that so many people had to suffer, this makes the audience grateful that they did not have to suffer these consequences and brings about a sense of thankfulness.
Mis-en-scene- The main location for the documentary was Auschwitz camp itself so it was unnerving enough without the added factor of snow masking some of the horror. The interviews were conducted with a black background so as not to distract from the interviewee speaking to the camera, this made the audience focus on the interview and see the emotions flash across their faces as they spoke. A majority of the footage was black and white as it was mostly from the 40’s and so before colour television.
Sound-The majority of the sound in the documentary was an unnerving music bed which made the audience really think about the actions on screen, the interviews were conducted with mostly natural sound except the polish interviews which had English dubbing to help the audience to understand them , also on some of the archive footage archive interview audio was also used in scenes such as the gas chambers and a voice over narrated the rest so that the audience would understand the footage better.
Editing-The editing used a lot of cuts between different archive materials to keep the audience’s attention and to explain more about the camp, fades and dissolves were also used to separate parts of the documentary and to lighten some of the atmosphere as it got a bit heavy in places.
Archive material- A lot of the archive material used was form the 40’s so it was all in black and white to show the audience the camp as it was years ago and how it worked.
Graphics- Graphics were fairly basic during the majority of the documentary, the font of the titles was fairly macabre as it was designed to look like a wall around the words as if you might find the titles scrawled on a brick wall under one of the beds, this scares the audience slightly as it is a basic reference to the Jews scratching their names into their beds and walls in order to be remembered.
9/11 State Of Emergency
Type Of Documentary-This is a mixed documentary as it uses interviews with a voice over and both archive footage and reconstructions.
Themes-There were a number of themes put forward in this documentary such as the events of 9/11 and the devastation that is caused worldwide , other themes are the presidential reaction to this and the emergency services helping manage the aftermath.
Narrative System- The story of 9/11 is known globally and is told to the audience with the help of a reconstruction of the events happening inside the first plane up until its crash, the conflict is shown from the very beginning as many people were saying that it was just another calm normal day, until the planes were hijacked. The middle continues with the conflict as it begins to introduce conspiracy theories and how that affected the people of America, also photographs and videos of the crash and its devastation are continuously shown to the audience to further the point of who would do this to innocent people. A reconstruction of the first alert of terrorism is also shown to the audience of an airhostess calmly phoning down to ground control to inform them that someone n business class has been stabbed and she thinks they are being hijacked, the phone call is then terminated as the plane hits the tower and the operator can be heard to say “I think we’ve lost her” this would shock the audience as both the hostess and the operator were very calm up until the end. The ending of the documentary gives the audience a sense of closure and leaves them with some bittersweet satisfaction.
Camerawork-A lot of high angles are used to show long shots of the country to symbolise the unity of the country and the collective grief that will be felt at this disaster. High angles were used during the reconstruction to show the airline workers as dependant and helpless in the face of impending doom, low angle shots were used of the planes as the threat of terror was bigger than America expected and America are powerless to the actions of the terrorists as they are still in a mass state of shock including the President. Hand held cameras are used to show point of view shots of the emergency workers and the victims as this would be more powerful to the viewer and they would feel humbled by the heroic acts of the emergency workers and astounded at the lengths some of the victims went through in order to stay alive.
Mis-en-scene-In most of the interviews the interviewees are filmed with a black or red background to make it seem professional and not to distract from what is being said, they are also wearing suits or smart clothing to give the documentary an air of professionalism and seriousness. Also close-ups of their faces are used to show the emotions that are evident on their faces when they talk about what was going through their minds at that specific moment.
Sound-There was a lot of natural dietetic sound used as it was a majority of sirens and screaming, this could be to show the panic that ensued after the original attack, however in the interviews there is only the person speaking as what they have to say is very important to the documentary and they do not want focus to be drawn to something else, during the reconstructions especially a lot of thought provoking sounds are used such as people screaming to god and wailing of children to make the audience understand fully the seriousness of the situation, as the voice over explains that “2,605 people died in and around the world trade centre that day including 411 emergency workers” soft music is played over footage of people scouring the wreck for bodies to create a reaction from the audience of shock and despair.
Editing-A majority of the editing as regards archive footage and reconstructions is very fast so as to engage the audience and to get their adrenaline pumping and make them feel anxious as to what is going to happen to the people on the screen as there are shots of people falling hundreds of metres and hitting other buildings and the floor. Long shot are used for important parts of the reconstructions such as when the air hostess is reporting the hijacking the camera stays on her explaining what happening and when the emergency workers are rescuing people from the buildings and it collapses on them, this is done to shock the audience and make them understand the full extent of these situations.
Archive Material-A lot of the material used was archive as many different news show and the public filmed the planes hitting the towers and the towers collapsing, also the reconstruction of the plane crash uses the actual recording of the hijacking report from the air hostess and the operator’s reaction to this. Archive material of President Bush being told about the second plane crash whilst in a children’s school also is shown to explain why he did not act immediately on this information as he would have alarmed the students and also would have been shown by the media to be a wreck.
Graphics- Graphics were used sparingly as a lot of the interviewees were introduced in the voice over, one of the reasons graphics weren’t used a lot was to keep the audiences focus on the events unfolding on screen rather than on who the person is.
Friday 1 October 2010
Research Questionnaire
Questionnaire
- What age are you?
............................................................. - What gender are you?
Male [ ] Female [ ] - What times do you usually watch television at?
.......................................................................................................................... - What genre of TV programme do you usually watch?
.......................................................................................................................... - What channels are your favorite?
.......................................................................................................................... - As a teenager what stereotype were you?
.......................................................................................................................... - What influenced you most as a teenager?
.......................................................................................................................... - Do you think teenagers are influenced by
Celebrities [ ] Media [ ] Friends [ ] Games [ ] Other [ ] - Do you think teenagers get bad press in the media? Why?
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... - Does/has teenage antisocial behaviour affected you at all?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Do you think there are any major differences between the youth of today and that of the past? Explain your answer?
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... - Should something be done to keep teenagers off the streets?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Are/were your friends in the same stereotype as you?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Do you think teenagers today are given too much freedom?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Did your upbringing influence your stereotype?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Do you think there are certain behaviour aspects associated with each stereotype?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - What do/did you do at the weekends as a teenager?
.......................................................................................................................... - Do you think teenagers are more violent now?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Do you ever get scared when you see a large group of teenagers?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - Do you think there are more gangs of teenagers than in the past?
Yes [ ] No [ ] - What do you think could change the way young people are thought of?
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... - Do you think narcotics are more freely available to teenagers than in the past?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
Although the numbers are quite close, the majority do think that teenagers are given to much freedom and the public think that this might be the cause to anti-social behaviour.
We asked the general public what their ages were, and the common age range was 10-20 years old. We want to aim our documentary to this age range but we dont want to limit ourselves on target audience because we believe that a lot more people of an older age would be interested in our documentary topic and would watch it.
When we asked the public did they think that social behaviours effected the behaviour of teenagers the majority of people answered yes.
When we asked people if they thought teenagers are more violent than they used to be, the majority answered yes. We asked a range of ages so this result is a good because we know its a fair result
Most people we asked thought that yes teenagers do behave differently
About the same number of people were influenced by media as by music with a slightly less number being influenced by fashion
This is a pretty varied view of what influences teenagers in todays society but the media is only slightly the largest
The majority of our target audience watch television between 8pm and 10 pm, this is most likely because many soaps are on at this time and many parents would have put small children to bed
A majority of our target audience found that youth clubs would be the best way to get teenagers off the street
BBC is a trusted channel to most older people as it is the one with the best news programmes and is reguarded as a british institution and so many people in our target audience will watch this.
Although the numbers are very close there is a slight inclination to yes there is a cretain behaviour linked to each stereotype.
A majority of our target audience spent their weekends socialising and having fun with their friends.
A majority of our target audience were not effected by anti-social behaviour despite the idea of teenagers being so threatening
A majority of our target audience were chavs when they were teenagers, this is a surprising discovery as many chavs are blamed for the problems with society.
We asked slightly more women than men
TV Scheduling
There are specific times that certain programmes need to be broadcast at, these are to attract a certain target audience and gain more viewers.
Breakfast TV- This type of TV is aimed at predominantly employed people and students who are getting ready for work and school/college the programmes broadcast are usually News related to keep viewers up to date on current affairs.
Daytime TV-This type of TV is aimed at mostly housewives and unemployed people who are looking for some light entertainment that they dont nessecarily need to think about, the programmes broadcast at this time are usually chat shows such as This Morning or Jeremy Kyle.
Afternoon TV-This also is aimed mainly at housewives and unemployed people, programmes like 60 Minute Makeover are usually broadcast at this time so that housewives can think about how to improve their homes.
Primetime TV- This is the most popular period for watching TV as workers are home and so are housewives and unemployed people, soaps are usually broadcast at this time and are aimed at housewives as they usually enjoy programmes with a sense of extended reality.
Late Night TV-This period of TV is usually aimed at students as many students are able to stay up late at night to watch usually American programmes such as Glee and Ugly Betty. These are usually aimed at teenagers and under 25's.
Initial Ideas
The idea we have chosen is how teenagers have changed through time and what we think has influenced that. We feel that an acceptable age for our target audience would be about 30-50 as many people in this age bracket are more likely to either be a teenager or have a teenage child than other groups, also most 40-55 year olds are the most prejudice about teenagers than any other age group, it is these people who were the Mods and the Punks as teenagers and so were stereotyped in a bad way.
We think a suitable time for our documentary to be shown would be about 8:00pm as it is late enough to attract slightly older viewers but also early enough that it would not lose younger viewers. We think broadcasting our documentary on Channel 4 will also be beneficial as they are renowned for their documentaries usually being more hard hitting and cutting edge.
We think a suitable time for our documentary to be shown would be about 8:00pm as it is late enough to attract slightly older viewers but also early enough that it would not lose younger viewers. We think broadcasting our documentary on Channel 4 will also be beneficial as they are renowned for their documentaries usually being more hard hitting and cutting edge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)